Difference: SplitClusterStudy (10 vs. 11)

Revision 112017-12-19 - AdamHunyadi

Line: 1 to 1
META TOPICPARENT name="AdamHunyadi"

Split Cluster Study


Line: 29 to 29
 git remote add hunyadix git@github.com:hunyadix/cmssw.git git fetch hunyadix git checkout -t hunyadix/ModForPixelMerger
git clone git@github.com:hunyadix/PhaseISplitClusterAnalyzer.git DPGAnalysis/PhaseISplitClusterAnalyzer scram b -j 20

Generating a CMSSW config file

Line: 91 to 92
  Running the HistogramMerger is as simple as checking out the git repository and specifying the target files and the output name in src/main.cxx.


  • The pixel markers are seemingly present for all the cluster pixels when the pileup is 0 (1). The function checkDetIdToMarkerPtrMap() is currently run for each of the events and it prints out how many of the clusters have a corresponding marker.
  • In the analyzer testPairFinding() tests the private areClustersPair() for pair finding efficiency. Seems like the pair finding works just fine if the cluster objects have properly set x, y and size fields.


TTbar events, no pileup, 95% dcol efficiency statistics files:

This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright &© by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback