|
META TOPICPARENT |
name="CBwaves" |
Comparison of CBwaves, Columbia, NR and hybrid waveforms |
|
Hybrid waveforms |
|
< < | Ninja2 waveforms are hibrydized and available for comparsion. The plot below shows the /BAM_D11spp50_96.T4.hyb.n2.gwf waveform compare with CBwaves as an example.
Parameters are: |
> > | Ninja2 waveforms are hibrydized and available for comparsion. The plot below shows the /BAM_D11spp50_96.T4.hyb.n2.gwf waveform compare with CBwaves as an example. Parameters are: |
|
- m1 = m2 = 2.48 Msun
- ecc = 0.0061
- D = 11 M
- s1z = s2z = 0.5
|
|
< < |
Comparsion is not straightforward because: |
> > |
Comparsion is not straightforward because: |
|
- Initial conditions for the NR simulations are not completely known
- Have to split hybrid waveforms so get only the NR part
- There could be (is) a phase shift between the waveforms that has to be checked / modified
|
|
- The inclusion of all the PN contributions is important
- The use of the BT gauge provides results similar to NR data
- With the appropriate change of the coordinates the results in the BT and DD gauges can be transformed to each other
|
|
< < |
- Unphysical behaviour is excluded if one takes into account the domain of validity of PN and the requirements for energy conservation
|
> > |
- Anomalies are excluded if one takes into account the domain of validity of PN and the requirements for energy conservation
|
|
META FILEATTACHMENT |
attachment="comparsion.jpg" attr="" comment="" date="1352992737" name="comparsion.jpg" path="comparsion.jpg" size="83106" stream="comparsion.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp3179" user="GergelyDebreczeni" version="1" |
META FILEATTACHMENT |
attachment="comparsion2.jpg" attr="" comment="Hybrid PN comparsion" date="1352992932" name="comparsion2.jpg" path="comparsion2.jpg" size="65300" stream="comparsion2.jpg" tmpFilename="/usr/tmp/CGItemp3149" user="GergelyDebreczeni" version="1" |
|