Difference: SiPixelQuality (15 vs. 16)

Revision 162016-07-31 - TamasVami

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="CmsSusy"

Tracking effect

Added:
>
>

TimingStudy 

/data/vami/projects/pilotBlade/pp2016ReProcessing_v3/CMSSW_8_0_8/src/miniDAQ/All/Ntuples
TimingStudy
TChain chain("trajTree");
chain.Add("/data/vami/projects/Validation/TrackingEffect/CMSSW_8_0_13_patch1/src/One/crab_Runs275891-275914-Ntuple-v3/results/Ntuple*.root")

h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)
# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302059012&&traj.validhit==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302059012&&traj.missing==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302059012&&traj_inactive==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302059012&&traj_badhit==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")

chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302059012&&traj.validhit==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302059012&&traj.missing==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302059012&&traj_inactive==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")

TChain chain("clustTree");
chain.Add("Ntuple*.root")
chain.Draw("x:y","module_on.rawid==302059012","COLZ") // all clusters

# -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302126344&&traj.validhit==0&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302126344&&traj.missing==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302126344&&traj_inactive==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302126344&&traj_badhit==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")
 
Added:
>
>		chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302126344&&traj.validhit==0&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ") chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302126344&&traj.missing==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ") chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302126344&&traj_inactive==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")

TChain chain("clustTree"); chain.Add("Ntuple*.root") chain.Draw("x:y","module_on.rawid==302126344","COLZ") // all clusters

# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302123800&&traj.validhit==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ") chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302123800&&traj.missing==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ") chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302123800&&traj_inactive==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ") chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(8,-3.0,3.0,2,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302123800&&traj_badhit==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")

chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302123800&&traj.validhit==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ") chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302123800&&traj.missing==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ") chain.Draw("traj.lx:traj.ly>>h1(416,-3.0,3.0,160,-.55,.55)","module_on.rawid==302123800&&traj_inactive==1&&traj_onedge==0","COLZ")

TChain chain("clustTree"); chain.Add("Ntuple*.root") chain.Draw("x:y","module_on.rawid==302123800","COLZ") // all clusters

 What happens with modules marked bad that come alive from time to time?

Studying the valid/traj_missing/traj_inactive modules in three scenarios

Line: 25 to 78
 
Deleted:
<
<

Result

  • half of the module does not contain valid hits
  • there are no traj_missing hits
  • there are no traj_inactive hits
 

Scenario 2)

We have a bad component and it is included in the DB already

--> in SiPixelQuality_v34_data an old half module (BPix_BmO_SEC7_LYR2_LDR13F_MOD3 (ROC0-7) -- 302126344 [this was added in v33])
Line: 46 to 94
 
Deleted:
<
<

Result

  • half of the module is does not contain the valid hits
  • the other half contain the traj_missing hits
  • there are no traj_inactive hits
 

Scenario 3)

A module is marked bad although it is working

--> v35_data (302123800)
Line: 66 to 109
 
Deleted:
<
<

Result

  • the whole module contains valid hits, the lower part has twice of the number of hits as the upper half
  • there are traj_missing hits in the upper half
  • there are no traj_inactive hits
 

Dateset boarders

Dataset name From #Run Until #Run Comment
View topic | History: r33 < r32 < r31 < r30 | More topic actions...
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright &© by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback